BD humanizer-pro
Transform AI-generated text into authentic human writing. Detects and removes 24 AI patterns, replaces 500+ AI vocabulary terms, analyzes statistical signals (burstiness, vocabulary diversity), and injects personality through strategic misspellings, parenthetical asides, tangents, and random thoughts. Use when humanizing content, checking for AI tells, removing robotic patterns, adding natural voice, making text sound less polished, or when asked to write like a specific person. Works with social posts, articles, emails, marketing copy, documentation—any text that needs to sound genuinely human.
Transform AI-generated text into authentic human writing.
As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency
What is at stake
The skill contains fragments that, in the wrong hands, cost money or data. Below: what the installer risks and what the author should do.
The files contain invisible characters, encoded commands or comments hidden from readers but visible to the model. What you read differs from what the agent sees.
Remove invisible characters (they usually sneak in through copy-paste) and encoded strings: no catalog will pass them. Instructions for the model must be readable by a human too.
How to improve
- Address the high-severity findings: each costs 18 safety points. If one is a false positive, add the rule id to guard.allow in spec.yaml.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 2
-
high Obfuscation
uni-zero-widthreferences/personality-injection.md:484Zero-width / invisible characters (possible hidden text) (3 occurrences)␀
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Obfuscation
uni-zero-widthreferences/examples.md:130Zero-width / invisible characters (possible hidden text) (4 occurrences) (test fixture / example file)␀
fixture
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (humanizer-pro) differs from the folder (operator-humanizer)
- 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 85Steps. 84 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3000 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 602: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 33 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 84 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 5)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.