BC osori
Osori v1.6.1 — Local project registry & context loader with Telegram slash commands. Registry versioning + auto-migration + root filters + root management + doctor (preview-first + risk gate) + safe root remove + switch multi-match + GitHub count cache + alias/favorite + Entire integration commands. Find, switch, list, add/remove projects, check status. Triggers: work on X, find project X, list projects, project status, project switch. | 오소리 — 텔레그램 슬래시 명령어 지원 로컬 프로젝트 레지스트리.
Osori v1.6.1 — Local project registry & context loader with Telegram slash commands. Registry versioning + auto-migration + root filters + root management +…
As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 22. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Steps. 68 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2906 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -43 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- -38 of 15 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 478: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 23 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 68 items
- +4Has examples (19 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 64.