BD skill-auditor
The definitive security scanner for OpenClaw skills. 18 security checks including prompt injection detection, download-and-execute, privilege escalation, credential harvesting, supply chain attacks, crypto drains, and more. 5-dimension trust scoring with trend tracking.
The definitive security scanner for OpenClaw skills.
As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 16
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 16
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityCHANGELOG.md:24Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- **Check 18: Privilege Escalation** (CRITICAL) - Detects sudo commands, chmod 777/setuid, writes to system paths (/usr/local/bin, /etc/), chown root.
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityCHANGELOG.md:97Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)- Credential harvesting detection
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:4Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)description: "The definitive security scanner for OpenClaw skills. 18 security checks including prompt injection detection, download-and-execute, privilege escalation, credential harvesting, supply ch
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:150Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)Malicious fixtures: credential harvest, obfuscated payload, sensitive fs reads, crypto wallets, time bombs, symlink attacks, prompt injection, download-execute, privilege escalation.
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityTEST-FIXTURES-WARNING.md:13Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition; test fixture / example file)| malicious-basic | Credential harvesting + network exfiltration |
detectorfixture
A further 11 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.
Files scanned: 14. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (skill-auditor) differs from the folder (yoder-skill-auditor)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 85Steps. 20 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1597 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 270: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.