AB treatment-plan-presentation
Present a dental treatment plan the patient actually understands and accepts — sequenced by clinical priority, costed with their coverage applied, and explained in the order that answers what-is-wrong before what-it-costs. Use when asked to present a treatment plan, improve case acceptance, explain treatment to a patient, or handle a patient who says they want to think about it. Produces the phased plan, the plain-language explanation per phase, the cost and coverage breakdown, the consequences-of-delay framing, and responses to the four common objections. Clinical decisions remain the treating clinician's; this shapes the conversation, not the diagnosis.
Present a dental treatment plan the patient actually understands and accepts — sequenced by clinical priority, costed with their coverage applied, and…
As a process B 78/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice, progress reporting
The same skill appears in 2 more places: pm-claude-skills, pm-claude-skills
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 78/100
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 39 steps
- 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1550 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 663: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 39 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (0 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.