CF rea-analysis-optimization
Optimize REA providers and shared analysis workflows for agent context, latency, CPU, and memory while preserving correctness and Evidence. Use for analysis bottlenecks and cache or query design; CI/test-suite optimization belongs to rea-ci-tests-audit.
Promises to optimize REA providers and shared analysis workflows: cut latency, CPU and memory load without breaking correctness. Three files total, but broken_references signals missing dependencies—the skill points to things that don't exist. Quality score 69 and process score 30 indicate incompleteness: logic is there, structure isn't. No critical findings reported, though medium/low issues stay hidden. Never tested on models, sandbox untouched.
Install if you're ready to patch gaps locally. For production use—risky move. Broken references mean half the logic lives elsewhere or vanished. For tinkering with your own REA providers as a starting template—workable.
Optimize REA providers and shared analysis workflows for agent context, latency, CPU, and memory while preserving correctness and Evidence.
As a process F 30/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: ../../../AGENTS.md, ../../../docs/tool-design.md, ../../../docs/testing.md
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../AGENTS.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../docs/tool-design.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: ../../../docs/testing.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 30/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../../../AGENTS.md, ../../../docs/tool-design.md, ../../../docs/testing.md
- 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1858 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3No numbered steps or checklist
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 253: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 5 headings
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.