SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CD Verification & Quality Assurance

Check code quality and change risk with ruflo's shipped analysis commands (analyze diff, analyze complexity, analyze code), and run or extend ruflo's own CI regression guards. Use when assessing a change's risk, finding complexity hot spots, or adding a regression guard to ruflo. The truth-scoring and auto-rollback commands described later in this file are design notes, not shipped CLI commands.

ruvnet/ruflo Agent Skills author: ruvnet MIT 1 file body ≈ 5 000 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Check code quality and change risk with ruflo's shipped analysis commands (analyze diff, analyze complexity, analyze code), and run or extend ruflo's own CI…

As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: ../../../verification/README.md, scripts/audit-tool-descriptions.mjs, scripts/audit-<name>.mjs

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
39/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: ../../../verification/README.md, scripts/audit-tool-descriptions.mjs, scripts/audit-<name>.mjs
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: Verification & Quality Assurance (ruvnet/claude-flow)

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Exfiltration exfil-secret-in-url SKILL.md:575
    Credential passed in a URL query string (normal for some APIs — verify the host is the intended service) (placeholder value)
    curl -X POST "https://api.datadoghq.com/api/v1/series?api_key=…" \
    placeholder
  • low Exfiltration net-credential-use SKILL.md:575
    Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (documentation of a security skill)
    curl -X POST "https://api.datadoghq.com/api/v1/series?api_key=…" \
    security skill

Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning name-format name should be kebab-case (lowercase letters, digits, hyphens)
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../../verification/README.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/audit-tool-descriptions.mjs
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/audit-<name>.mjs

Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../../verification/README.md, scripts/audit-tool-descriptions.mjs, scripts/audit-<name>.mjs
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../../../verification/README.md, scripts/audit-tool-descriptions.mjs, scripts/audit-<name>.mjs
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (Verification & Quality Assurance) differs from the folder (verification-quality)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5000 tokens
  • 100Steps. 95 steps
  • low The response is described with custom markup (5 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 398: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 40 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 95 items
  • +4Has examples (28 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.