SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC scenario-video-assembly

Use when generated clips must become a finished video on Scenario via MCP: cutting a shot list together, laying a timeline, concatenating with transitions, overlaying a logo or title card, adding a music bed or voiceover, burning in or exporting captions and subtitles, trimming and splitting, or producing vertical and square variants of one master. Keywords: edit, assemble, stitch, concat, compositor, timeline, layers, overlay, captions, SRT, ad, UGC, social cut.

scenario-labs/skills Agent Skills author: scenario-labs 1 file body ≈ 2 227 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 15 h ago

Use when generated clips must become a finished video on Scenario via MCP: cutting a shot list together, laying a timeline, concatenating with transitions…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 12 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2227 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 467: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.