SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC threejs-spectral-ocean

Build large procedural oceans and coast transitions in Three.js. Use for WebGPU/TSL FFT oceans, multi-cascade wavelength bands, coastal breakers, finite-volume shallow-water beach waves, signed-distance coastlines, shallow-water swash films, wet-sand transitions, rock-impact spray, stylized above/below surface optics, permanently submerged Snell-window views, total internal reflection, forward-refracted structures through an interface, pixel-footprint spectral LOD, aquatic perspective, caustic god rays, choppy displacement, spectral derivatives, Jacobian whitecaps, windrow and temporal foam, analytic sky reflection, underwater absorption, crest scatter, and GPU validation.

scottstts/Threejs-Awesome-Graphics-Agent-Skills Agent Skills author: scottstts MIT 53 files · 48 scripts body ≈ 1 743 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Build large procedural oceans and coast transitions in Three.js. Use for WebGPU/TSL FFT oceans, multi-cascade wavelength bands, coastal breakers…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 53. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 34 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1743 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 681: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.