SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC babysit-pr-to-pass-ci

Start and persistently pursue a goal to babysit an SGLang pull request until selected GitHub Actions workflows pass on the latest PR head. Use when asked to monitor, babysit, retry, or fix PR CI for lint.yml, pr-test.yml, pr-test-extra.yml, AMD, or other named workflows; classify failures as PR-related versus flaky or infrastructural, auto-fix and push only small clean fixes, rerun failed jobs only up to 10 times, and ignore unselected workflows.

sgl-project/sglang Agent Skills author: sgl-project Apache-2.0 2 files body ≈ 2 891 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 18 h ago

Start and persistently pursue a goal to babysit an SGLang pull request until selected GitHub Actions workflows pass on the latest PR head.

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureGitHubSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 24 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 77 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2891 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 450: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 77 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.