SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CF ci-test-audit

Audit the existing test tree and CI configuration for improvements, using a catalog of patterns previously applied in this repo. Use when asked to audit tests or CI, shrink CI time or cost, find redundant or misplaced tests, clean up a test group, or review whether a CI change follows established practice.

sgl-project/sglang Agent Skills author: sgl-project Apache-2.0 2 files body ≈ 433 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Audit the existing test tree and CI configuration for improvements, using a catalog of patterns previously applied in this repo.

As a process F 18/100 · No process to follow — References files that are not bundled: ../write-sglang-test/SKILL.md, ../ci-workflow-guide/SKILL.md, scripts/ci/

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) OpenClaw Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
18/100
No process to follow
References files that are not bundled: ../write-sglang-test/SKILL.md, ../ci-workflow-guide/SKILL.md, scripts/ci/
Tools and files w 18
0
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../write-sglang-test/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../ci-workflow-guide/SKILL.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/ci/

Process rating: all ten parameters 18/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../write-sglang-test/SKILL.md, ../ci-workflow-guide/SKILL.md, scripts/ci/
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: ../write-sglang-test/SKILL.md, ../ci-workflow-guide/SKILL.md, scripts/ci/
  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 433 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +4No input/output examples
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 307: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 4 headings

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.