BB enterprise-vpn-attack
External SSL VPN / remote-access appliance attack matrix
External SSL VPN / remote-access appliance attack matrix
As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, failures and branches, running it twice
The same skill appears in 2 more places: agentic-awesome-skills, agentic-awesome-skills
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:140Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)| **CVE-…481** | RAVPN | DoS via crafted handshake | **SKIP in red team — disruptive** |
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:328Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition)- **Don't run pre-auth-RCE PoCs in red team without explicit OK** — accidentally bricking a VPN concentrator = catastrophic for the client. Detection-only tests first, then escalate with permission.
detector -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.md:356Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)CVE is not proof of file-write-to-root or a universal exploit chain. Credential
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "risk" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_repo" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "source_type" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "date_added" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "license_source" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "sources" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "report_count"
Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4221 tokens
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 29 steps
- 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +3Description length 56: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
- +4Structure: 28 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 29 items
- +4Has examples (16 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.