SKILLEMALL.ai

BB interactive-portfolio

Expert in building portfolios that actually land jobs and clients - not just showing work, but creating memorable experiences. Covers developer portfolios, designer portfolios, creative portfolios, and portfolios that convert visitors into opportunities.

The skillemall take

Promises expertise in building portfolios that land jobs and clients—focused on conversion, not just showcasing work. Covers developers, designers, and creatives.

Data shows: grade B, quality 84%, process 67%. No critical errors, two files intact, but no scripts. Models weren't tested, sandbox didn't run. In practice, you'll get text-based advice on structure and conversion tactics, but no automation or live examples.

Install if you need guidance in written form. Skip if you expect ready-made generators or interactive tools.

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills Agent Skills author: sickn33 MIT 2 files body ≈ 420 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Expert in building portfolios that actually land jobs and clients - not just showing work, but creating memorable experiences.

As a process B 67/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, failures and branches

GeneratorSoftware developmentMarketingPeople and hiringtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
67/100
Nearly there
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: agentic-awesome-skills

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 67/100

    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 15 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 420 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 254: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.