CC framework-topology
Turns a crystal structure (CIF) of a hydrogen-bonded, coordination or covalent framework into its underlying net and the quantities a topology question asks for: node definition, the periodic quotient graph, connectivity as distinct neighbours rather than bond counts, degree of interpenetration, coordination sequences and RCSR three-letter symbols, and internodal distances. Use whenever a task asks for the topology, connectivity, interpenetration or net symbol of a HOF, MOF, COF or molecular crystal from CIF or coordinate data; use atomistic-workflows for simulation setup and cheminformatics-definitions for molecular descriptors.
Turns a crystal structure (CIF) of a hydrogen-bonded, coordination or covalent framework into its underlying net and the quantities a topology question asks…
As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.
Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Broad scope
meta-broad-allowed-toolsSKILL.md:1Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bashallowed-tools: Read Write Bash python
Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary"
Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
- 100Steps. 14 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1553 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 637: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 4 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.