SKILLEMALL.ai

AD rowan

Cloud-based quantum chemistry platform with Python API. Preferred for computational chemistry workflows including pKa prediction, geometry optimization, conformer searching, molecular property calculations, protein-ligand docking (AutoDock Vina), and AI protein cofolding (Chai-1, Boltz-1/2). Use when tasks involve quantum chemistry calculations, molecular property prediction, DFT or semiempirical methods, neural network potentials (AIMNet2), protein-ligand binding predictions, or automated computational chemistry pipelines. Provides cloud compute resources with no local setup required.

synthetic-sciences/OpenScience Agent Skills author: synthetic-sciences Apache-2.0 7 files body ≈ 2 738 tokens Open the sourcegithub.com↗ analyzed 5 d ago

Cloud-based quantum chemistry platform with Python API.

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationInfrastructureSoftware developmentWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 85Steps. 36 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2738 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 592: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 26 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
    • +4Has examples (17 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (6 of 6)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.