Skill rating
15 skills. The A–F grade combines safety (60%) and quality (40%); tests add a bonus. The rating refreshes automatically from open catalogs.
ManufacturingLogistics and warehouseProcurementQuality controlContact centreField serviceFinanceCustomer supportindustry shortcuts
| # | Grade | Skill | Score ▾ | Safety | Quality | Process | Tests | Popularity | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | Use when LoopX must manage a multi-PR or multi-MR delivery program across one or more repositories: inventory current change requests, reconcile new/merged/closed or retargeted work, preserve requirem | 100 | 90 | C | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 2 | B | Operate an explicitly activated LoopX Material Lifecycle for a connected project. Use for material-store inventory, lossless migration, candidate/archive transitions, exact-read-backed ranking, ranked | 100 | 83 | C | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 3 | B | Use when a LoopX worker is operating an auto-research lane, demo pane, frontier item, evidence packet, promotion/retirement decision, or visible tmux/Codex auto-research rehearsal. Identity must come | 100 | 79 | C | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 4 | B | Qualify the exact final diff for a LoopX-managed goal. Use when goal policy enables change_quality_qualification, before a non-trivial delivery or merge, and when producing or repairing an exact-scope | 100 | 79 | C | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 5 | B | Use when a connected LoopX project is asked to read, remember, record, index, register, or use a durable project material such as a Lark/wiki/design doc, research note, SOP, owner packet, migration re | 100 | 79 | C | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 6 | B | Use for `/loopx-pr-review` or evidence-backed PR queue review. Run `loopx pr-review` first, execute the capability-owned review plan for each selected exact head, then publish complete reviews primari | 100 | 79 | D | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 7 | C | Inspect authorized LoopX Goals, Todos and deliveries to explain progress, identify owner decisions and delegate intent to the right worker. | 100 | 67 | C | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 8 | C | Optional maintainer workflow for the approval, merge-readiness, or authorized self-merge decision on a LoopX pull request. Requires the exact-head review evidence from `loopx pr-review`. Review depth, | 100 | 63 | D | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 9 | C | Migrate historical SWE-Marathon agent configurations to the shared Codex runtime. | 100 | 58 | D | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 10 | B | Use for LoopX project lifecycle work: connect or configure a project/Goal, repair project-local state or stale dashboard status, sync registry entries, or diagnose CLI/PATH/status/history routing. In | 100 | 77 | C missing files | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 11 | C | Adopt and operate LoopX for durable goals, long-running agent work, scoped collaboration, evidence-backed progress, and recovery across sessions. Use when the user asks to set up LoopX, start or resum | 84 | 74 | B | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 12 | C | Diagnose and repair LoopX control-plane drift or agent behavior drift. Use when a LoopX task makes unexpectedly small progress, follows a stale or contradictory recommended_action, ignores a higher-pr | 95 | 80 | C missing files | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 13 | C | 在 Terminal-Bench 4.0 上做 codex harness 五臂对照(裸 codex / 原生 /goal / LoopX 三模式)。复用 SWE-Marathon 那套驱动,靠 WEN_BENCH 切换。重点是 TB4 相对 SWE-Marathon 的四处结构性差异——每一处踩错都**退出码 0、有轨迹、有分数**,只是分数不对。 | 100 | 63 | F missing files | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 14 | C | Operate or analyze LoopX-managed benchmark experiments through benchmark-toolkit, including trajectory-based effectiveness and efficiency diagnosis, matched comparisons, run selection and integrity. S | 100 | 61 | D missing files | — | — | 11 d ago | |
| 15 | D | Diagnose demonstrated CPU, command latency, allocation or IO regressions in an owned process with controlled measurements and language-appropriate profilers. Route benchmark effectiveness, score growt | 82 | 53 | D missing files | — | — | 11 d ago |