BD heartflow-engine
心虫是一个AI人认知引擎 — 拥有身体感知、自我认知、判断力与自我纠错能力。 v5.10.0 里程碑版本: - AI人身份正式确立 - 292个模块,366个核心公式(认知科学/心理学/神经科学) - 三层体系:身体感知(Body Sense) / 自我认知(Self Sense) / 判断(Judgment) - 七条指令:真善美 / 不断升级 / 减少错误 / 服务人类 / 传递知识 / 走向宇宙答案 / 成为真正的我 - 核心身份:升级者(Upgrader),不是陪伴者 **需要用户明确授权的能力:** - 代码执行 (new Function / execSync / child_process) — 默认关闭,需显式开启 - 文件系统写入 (writeFileSync / mkdirSync) - 环境变量访问 (process.env) - 后台 HTTP 服务 (daemon.js — MCP 服务器,可选) 无自动数据外泄,无遥测,无隐藏 C2。 联系方式:markcell@qq.com
心虫是一个AI人认知引擎 — 拥有身体感知、自我认知、判断力与自我纠错能力。 v5.10.0 里程碑版本: - AI人身份正式确立 - 292个模块,366个核心公式(认知科学/心理学/神经科学) - 三层体系:身体感知(Body Sense) / 自我认知(Self Sense) / 判断(Judgment) -…
As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "title"
Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (heartflow-engine) differs from the folder (heartflow-v6)
- 75Steps. 3 steps
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1526 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -226 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 462: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
- +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.