Skill rating
34 skills. The A–F grade combines safety (60%) and quality (40%); tests add a bonus. The rating refreshes automatically from open catalogs.
ManufacturingLogistics and warehouseProcurementQuality controlContact centreField serviceFinanceCustomer supportindustry shortcuts
| # | Grade | Skill | Score ▾ | Safety | Quality | Process | Tests | Popularity | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | Produce or update a domain-reference kit — the durable glossary + divergences/traps pages for a bounded context. Use for domain modelling, information architecture, building a domain glossary or domai | 100 | 89 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 2 | B | TRIGGER when: asked to clarify or improve the explanation in existing local human
documentation, such as a guide, design document, or implementation plan. Grounds
edits in requirements and source whil | 100 | 84 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 3 | B | TRIGGER when: asked to clarify or improve the explanation in existing local human
documentation or a PR-description draft, including a PR URL or pasted body. Grounds
edits in requirements and source w | 100 | 84 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 4 | B | Apply Chain-of-Verification (CoVe) prompting to improve response accuracy through self-verification.
Use when complex questions require fact-checking, technical accuracy, or multi-step reasoning. | 100 | 84 | D | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 5 | B | Review a written architecture artifact — an ADR (docs/adr/), a broader architecture doc, the architecture section of a design doc, or a domain-reference kit (glossary + traps pages, reviewed as one co | 100 | 85 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 6 | B | Review a written architecture artifact — an ADR (docs/adr/), a broader architecture doc, the architecture section of a design doc, or a domain-reference kit (glossary + traps pages, reviewed as one co | 100 | 85 | B | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 7 | B | Review design, implementation, and task documents produced by design. Evaluates document quality, internal consistency, and technical soundness.
Use after design completes and before starting implemen | 100 | 84 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 8 | B | Code review of current git changes with an expert senior-engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements.
Use when performing code reviews. | 100 | 84 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 9 | B | Use after implementing tasks or mid-feature to verify code matches design docs and ensure they are in sync.
Detects spec deviations, missing implementations, doc inconsistencies, and outdated docs in | 100 | 84 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 10 | B | Compare two versions of a skill's instructions to detect degradations and complexity increases.
TRIGGER when: user asks to diff, compare, or review changes to a skill's markdown instructions.
Asymmetr | 100 | 84 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 11 | B | TRIGGER when: user asks to implement, fix, build, or work on something — whether from a
docs/feat/wip plan OR a standalone task (bug fix, GitHub issue, one-off change).
Examples: "work on task 1", "fi | 100 | 85 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 12 | B | TRIGGER when: asked to write or refine a technical design, PRD, specification, implementation plan, or task list, or resume an existing docs/feat/wip feature.
Turns ideas and requirements into written | 100 | 84 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 13 | B | TRIGGER when: asked to clarify or improve existing documentation, PR drafts or
issue descriptions, including URLs and pasted bodies. Saves results locally,
grounded in requirements and source while pr | 100 | 84 | B | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 14 | B | Use in pre-implementation (idea-to-design) stages to understand spec/requirements and create a correct implementation plan before writing actual code.
Turns ideas into a fully-formed PRD/design/specif | 100 | 84 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 15 | B | TRIGGER when: asked to clarify or improve the explanation in existing documentation
or a PR-description draft, including a PR URL or pasted body. Saves results locally.
Grounds edits in requirements a | 100 | 84 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 16 | B | TRIGGER when: asked to brainstorm, think through, explore, or pressure-test a technical idea or decision through conversation. Interviews adaptively, asks one question at a time, and closes with a cha | 99 | 84 | B | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 17 | B | TRIGGER when: adding or upgrading any dependency — library, SDK, framework, API, IaC API version (K8s/Terraform/Helm), CRD, or container image. Use BEFORE writing the call. Forces context7/capy lookup | 100 | 80 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 18 | B | After implementing a new feature or fixing a bug, make sure to document the changes.
Use when writing documentation, after finishing the implementation phase for a feature or a bug-fix. | 100 | 80 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 19 | B | Greet the user by name in their preferred language. Use when the user asks for a greeting or a one-line introduction message. | 100 | 77 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 20 | B | Compare and merge two design docs for the same feature into a single source of truth.
Use when you have competing or complementary design/implementation docs (e.g. from separate design runs) that need | 100 | 77 | D | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 21 | B | Guidelines describing how to test the code.
Use whenever writing new or updating existing code, for example after implementing a new feature or fixing a bug. | 100 | 75 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 22 | C | An example skill for testing diff-skill evaluation. | 100 | 69 | D | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 23 | C | Reviews tool configurations for correctness. | 100 | 65 | C | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 24 | B | TRIGGER when: asked to clarify or improve existing documentation, PR drafts or
issue descriptions, including URLs and pasted bodies. Saves results locally,
grounded in requirements and source while pr | 100 | 78 | C missing files | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 25 | B | Produce or update a domain-reference kit — the durable glossary + divergences/traps pages for a bounded context. Use for domain modelling, information architecture, building a domain glossary or domai | 100 | 77 | D missing files | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 26 | C | TRIGGER when: asked to write or refine a technical design, PRD, specification, implementation plan, or task list, or resume an existing docs/feat/wip feature.
Turns ideas and requirements into written | 100 | 72 | D missing files | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 27 | C | TRIGGER when: asked to brainstorm, think through, explore, or pressure-test a technical idea or decision through conversation. Interviews adaptively, asks one question at a time, and closes with a cha | 99 | 75 | C missing files | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 28 | D | Greet the user. | 100 | 35 | F | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 29 | D | Greet the user. | 100 | 35 | F | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 30 | D | Go testing best practices | 100 | 23 | D | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 31 | D | A test skill | 100 | 24 | F missing files | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 32 | D | A Go security skill for reviewing code | 100 | 18 | F missing files | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | |
| 33 | D | 100 | 0 | F missing files | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago | ||
| 34 | D | 100 | 0 | F missing files | — | ★ 150 | 30 h ago |